Behold and See Science Series

The curriculum builds substantial science content knowledge systematically, with grade 5-7 books taking 'a large step up' in content depth and difficulty.

Review notes 'solid science content' and describes how upper grade books address 'a broad range of topics but select a narrow subtopic within each one, providing a more in-depth study than one usually finds.' Grade 5 book is described as 'very interesting to read, even as an adult.'

The curriculum requires parent teaching rather than independent student work, suggesting a direct instruction model.

Review explicitly states 'Parents should plan to teach these texts rather than use them for independent study' and notes that activities 'require some pre-planning and supervision.'

The curriculum systematically integrates hands-on activities with content instruction across all grade levels.

Review states 'Many lessons include hands-on activities that are an important part of the learning process' and 'This book is loaded with investigations and experiments.' Activities range from simple observations in early grades to complex experiments in upper grades.

Limited teacher support beyond answer keys and some supplemental activity suggestions.

Review mentions 'answer keys' and 'optional Suggestions for Supplemental Activities for each section' but no comprehensive teacher guides or professional development materials.

The curriculum includes some review components but limited evidence of systematic retrieval practice.

Review mentions 'review questions,' 'tests,' and 'Review activities for the first half are a series of word puzzles, a few activity sheets, and a Jeopardy type game.'

The curriculum includes vocabulary instruction with definitions, though implementation varies by grade level.

Review mentions 'vocabulary lists' and notes that 'In the first half, vocabulary words are accompanied by their definitions. In the second half, definitions are in a glossary at the end.'

No evidence provided regarding NGSS alignment or three-dimensional learning approach.

The review does not mention NGSS standards, three-dimensional learning, or science and engineering practices.